Analisis Komprehensif Normalisasi dalam Weighted Product Model: Implikasinya terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58982/krisnadana.v3i2.551Keywords:
Weighted Product Model, Normalisasi Matriks, Pengambilan KeputusanAbstract
Penelitian ini melakukan analisis komprehensif terhadap teknik normalisasi dan non-normalisasi matriks dalam Weighted Product Model (WPM) dan implikasinya terhadap pengambilan keputusan. Metodologi penelitian mencakup studi literatur, pengumpulan data dari kasus pemilihan supplier di sebuah hotel bintang empat di Bali, dan studi perbandingan dilakukan dalam lima simulasi berbeda. Hasil menunjukkan kesesuaian 100% antara peringkat yang dihasilkan oleh pendekatan dengan normalisasi dan pendekatan tanpa normalisasi, menunjukkan bahwa kedua pendekatan ini mempertahankan integritas data asli.
References
J. Wang and X. Wang, “CFNN without normalization-based acetone product quality prediction,” in International Symposium on Neural Networks, 2005, pp. 914–920.
P. P. Santika, I. P. S. Handika, K. K. Widiartha, and M. D. W. Aristana, “KOMPARASI METODE AHP–ROC DALAM PENENTUAN PRIORITAS ALTERNATIF TERBAIK,” J. Krisnadana, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 59–67, 2022.
P. W. Bridgman, Dimensional analysis. Yale university press, 2023.
E. Triantaphyllou and S. H. Mann, “An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 303–312, 1989.
G. S. Mahendra et al., IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN: Teori & Studi Kasus. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
M. Mohammadi and J. Rezaei, “Ratio product model: A rank?preserving normalization?agnostic multi?criteria decision?making method,” J. Multi?Criteria Decis. Anal., 2023.
Y. Perwira, “Penentuan Peringkat Pelanggan Terbaik dengan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus di PT. Asia Raya Foundry): Penentuan Peringkat Pelanggan Terbaik dengan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus di PT. Asia Raya Foundry),” J. Mantik, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 138–147, 2019.
M. A. Puspa, M. Lasena, H. Husain, and Z. Sidik, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Dalam Pengambilan keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan,” Bull. Inf. Technol., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 439–447, 2023.
E. Eziafriadi and A. Arman, “Sistem Pendukung Kelayakan Calon Penerima Bantuan Bedah Rumah Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” J. SANTI-Sistem Inf. dan Tek. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–21, 2022.
A. Ishizaka and S. Siraj, “Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 462–471, 2018.
I. G. I. Sudipa et al., MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING: Teori & Penerapan Metode Pengambilan Keputusan dengan MCDM. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
C. Tofallis, “Add or multiply? A tutorial on ranking and choosing with multiple criteria,” INFORMS Trans. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 109–119, 2014.
D. M. Khairina, M. R. Asrian, and H. R. Hatta, “Decision support system for new employee recruitment using weighted product method,” in 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 2016, pp. 297–301.
N. Aminudin, E. Sundari, K. Shankar, P. Deepalakshmi, R. I. Fauzi, and A. Maseleno, “Weighted Product and its application to measure employee performance,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.26, pp. 102–108, 2018.
A. Sinaga and D. Maulana, “Implementation of weighted product method for evaluating performance of technicians,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 30–42, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Wayan Surya Pramana, I Nyoman Darma Kotama, Anak Agung Gede Oka Kessawa Adnyana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
